Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align prop and misc identifier requirements for the official FedRAMP namespace #773

Open
11 of 16 tasks
aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #774 or #828
Open
11 of 16 tasks

Align prop and misc identifier requirements for the official FedRAMP namespace #773

aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #774 or #828

Comments

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

aj-stein-gsa commented Oct 11, 2024

This is a ...

improvement - something could be better

This relates to ...

  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Registry
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL baselines
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Content
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP System Security Plans (SSP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Plans (SAP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Results (SAR)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)
  • the FedRAMP SSP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAR OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP POA&M OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Validations

User Story

As a developer of OSCAL-based tools for FedRAMP documentation, I would like alignment on the properties @ns, @system and other identifier URIs that FedRAMP uses in different variations in their customization of the upstream custom models.

Goals

Dependencies

N/A

Acceptance Criteria

  • All FedRAMP Documents Related to OSCAL Adoption (https://github.com/GSA/fedramp-automation) affected by the changes in this issue have been updated.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals of this User Story. This issue is referenced in the PR.

Other information

  1. Add reference to 774 PR for item 1 in goals
@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Rene2mt volunteer to start this off for now and work on the ADR to start.

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🔖 Ready in FedRAMP Automation Oct 23, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🔖 Ready to 🏗 In progress in FedRAMP Automation Oct 23, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in FedRAMP Automation Oct 24, 2024
@Rene2mt
Copy link
Member

Rene2mt commented Oct 25, 2024

Drafted the ADR (PR #774 ) but next, need to stage changes to constraints and add another PR for the documentation site. Moving this back to in progress.

@Rene2mt
Copy link
Member

Rene2mt commented Oct 28, 2024

@aj-stein-gsa we're going to keep this open for a bit and try to get feedback, so I didn't want to move it to "review". The changes are small / simple but in a lot of places (the PRs touch a lot of files).

Once we're ready, I'll rebase the associated PRs and formally move to "review".

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aj-stein-gsa we're going to keep this open for a bit and try to get feedback, so I didn't want to move it to "review". The changes are small / simple but in a lot of places (the PRs touch a lot of files).

Once we're ready, I'll rebase the associated PRs and formally move to "review".

OK, got it. Sorry I read the email updates in the wrong order. 😆 Ignore my comment on #828 then.

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in FedRAMP Automation Oct 28, 2024
@vmangat
Copy link

vmangat commented Oct 30, 2024

Consistency is good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment