-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
All BNDs have no FORMAT:FT #127
Comments
Hi, I also found all BNDs have only AGGREGATED models. Is this what expected to see? I have used Manta for calling and svimmer for SV merging. Thank you, |
Hi, No, I haven't solve the problem of BND. So I have given up the method of filtering based on FT=PASS. I'm now using the PASS_ratio for filtering. Best regards, |
BND:-f "( SVTYPE = BND & QD > 20 & ( ABHet > 0.30 | ABHet < 0 ) & ( AC / NUM_MERGED_SVS ) < 10 & PASS_AC > 0 & PASS_ratio > 0.1 )" -f, --info-filter specifies a filter to apply to the info fields of records, removes alleles which do not pass the filter -g, --genotype-filter specifies a filter to apply to the genotype fields of records If you only use the PASS_ratio, then it only filter the BND records but not sample genotype? can it filter unpassed genotype? |
@jingydz Yes, the filtering I'm using now is for SV sites only. While I have also tried on filtering BND based on GQ>40 (you have to set a threshold here), and other types based on FT=PASS. Hope that helps. |
Thank you again. Finally I used "( GQ > 20 ) & ( AD > 10 )" for BND and "FT=PASS" for other types. |
Hi,
There are no FT tags in FORMAT fields for ALL BNDs. Do you have any idea why this happen?
Any idea or suggestion is appreciated.
Thank you,
Tingting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: